[3] Reminders About Dark Beliefs and Deeds of Those Who Scream and Wail; Slash, Whip and Hit Themselves On The Day of Aa’shooraa: [The Raafidah And The Aqeedah of Ar-Raj’ah]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Imaam Barbahaaree (rahimahullaah) stated:

The return to this world of those who have died (Ar-Raj’ah) is an innovation and is disbelief in Allaah, the Sublime. Whoever professes to believe it, is a disbeliever in Allaah and in this there is no doubt. Whoever believes in ar-raj-ah and says that Ali Ibn Abee Taalib is alive and will return before the Day of resurrection and says the same concerning Muhammad Ibn Ali, Ja’far Ibn Muhammad and Moosaa Ibn Ja’far and talks about the station of the Imaams and that they know the unseen, beware of them! They are disbelievers in Allaah, the Sublime.

Shaikh Saaleh al Fawzaan commented on the above statement saying: And concerning the statement of Imaam Barbahaaree: “Whoever believes in Ar-raj’ah”- This is with regards to the Shee’ah, for they say that the dead Imaams from ahlul bayt will return at the end of time, and that they will speak with justice, and that they will bring out Umar, Aboo Bakr and the sahaabah from their graves and burn them.

And concerning the statement of Imaam Barbahaaree (rahimahullaah): “Whoever professes to believe it, is a disbeliever in Allaah and in this there is no doubt”:  The one who speaks with the statement of Ar-raj’ah in this manner, then no doubt he is a disbeliever in Allaah [The Mighty and Majestic]. And concerning the statement of Imaam Barbahaaree (rahimahullaah): “And says that Ali Ibn Abee Taalib is alive”: The extremists amongst the (raafidah) say that Ali did not die and that he is in the clouds, and they worship him.

And concerning the statement of Imaam Barbahaaree (rahimahullaah): “And Muhammad Ibn Ali’the son of Hussain al Baaqir, and Ja’far ibn Muhammad, the son of Ali Ibn Hussain, and he is Ja’far As-Saadiq, ‘And Moosaa Ibn Ja’far’ al-Kaa’dhim Ibn Ja’far As-Saadiq”- This is why the raafidah call themselves al-moosaawiyyah, and al-musaawiy is an affiliation to Moosaa Al-Kaadhim.

And concerning the statement of Imaam Barbahaaree (rahimahullaah): “And talks about the station of the Imaams and that they know the unseen”- They (the raafidah) believe that their imaams possess knowledge of the unseen and that they legislate and abrogate what they wish in the sharee’ah, because Allaah has preferred them with this. ”And that Indeed they’ (i.e. the Imaams) ‘possess knowledge of the unseen’: Shaikh Fawzaan said: Is there anyone who has knowledge of the unseen besides Allaah?

And concerning the statement of Imaam Barbahaaree: “Beware of them! They are disbelievers in Allaah, the Sublime”.

Shaikh Fawzaan said: He is a disbeliever (Ref a) – the one who claims to possess knowledge of the unseen or that anyone else possesses knowledge of the unseen besides a Messenger of Allaah, whom He has chosen (and whom He informs of the unseen as much as He likes). Allaah said: ‘(He Alone is) the All-Knower of the Ghaib (Unseen), and He reveals to none His Ghaib (Unseen). Except to a Messenger (from mankind) whom He has chosen (He informs him of the Unseen as much as He likes)’. [Ref 1]

Imaam Barbahaaree (rahimahullaah) stated:

‘Tu’mah Ibn Amr and Sufyaan Ibn Uyainah said, ‘Whoever withholds judgment with regard to Uthmaan and Alee, he is Shee’ee. He is not to be held as reliable, nor spoken to, nor sat with. Whoever prefers Alee over Uthmaan is a Raafidee, who rejects the narrations from the Companions of Allaah’s Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam). Whoever gives precedence to the four over the rest of them and supplicates for Allaah’s Mercy upon the rest and withholds regarding their slips, he is upon the correct path and guidance in this matter.’

Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (hafidha-hullaah) commented on the above statement of Imaam Barbahaaree (rahimahullaah) saying: ”Whoever withholds in the affair of Uthmaan and Alee, and says that the khilaafah belongs to Alee and not to Uthmaan, is a shee’ee and is one to be disowned.  ‘He is not to be held as reliable’- Meaning: He is not judged to be reliable.  ‘He is neither spoken to’ (with) kind, pleasurable and agreeable speech ”nor sat with’, because his harm will be extended to the one who sits with him, and that is because the callers to misguidance do have an effect upon the man who sits with them and the one who accompanies them.

‘Whoever prefers Ali over Uthmaan is a Raafidee’- Meaning: concerning the affair of the khilaafah.  As for with regards to which of them is more virtuous, the scholars differed in this affair; some of them held that Ali is more virtuous and others held that uthmaan is more virtuous. As for with regards to the affair of the khilaafah, then whoever prefers Ali over Uthman is from the people of misguidance, because the Companions along with Ali himself all agreed that uthmaan is given preference (i.e. in the affair of the khilaafah)

‘He (i.e. the one who prefers Ali over uthman in the affair of the khilaafah) is one who rejects the narrations of the Companions of Allaah’s Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam)’; and they are called Raafidah, because they said to Zaid ibn Ali, ‘what do you say about Aboo Bakr and Umar?’ He (Zaid) said: ‘I love them and give them allegiance, because both of them were ministers of my grandfather, the Messenger of Allaah (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam).’ So they said, ‘then we reject you.’ So they rejected him and were called Raafidah (the rejecters), because they rejected Zaid Ibn Ali.

‘Whoever gives precedence to the four (i.e. Aboo Bakr, Umar, Uthmaan, and Ali) over the rest of them”: That is (precedence) over the rest of the Sahaabah, ‘and supplicates for Allaah’s Mercy upon the rest’ of the sahaabah; ”and withholds regarding their slips, he is upon correct path and guidance in this affair’: (That is he) withholds (from speaking) regarding the mistakes that occurred from some of them, because they are not infallible as individuals, (because) some mistakes did occur from some of them, but they have of excellence and Eemaan that which overrides their mistakes. They have of companionship with the Messenger of Allaah (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) that which overrides what occurred of minor mistakes. [Ref 2]


Ref 1: Source: It’haaful Qaaree Bitta’liqaat Alaa Sharhus Sunnah Lil Imaam Barbahaaree (Vol:2 page:285-286) by Shaikh Saaleh al Fawzaan (hafidha-hullaah)

Ref a: Removing a Muslim from the fold of Islaam is a serious matter, and it is solely the responsibility of the scholars of the Sunnah. Visit link to acquaint yourself with some of the rules utilised by the scholars before removing a person from the fold of Islaam. link:

http://www.salafipublications.com/sps/sp.cfm?secID=MNJ&subsecID=MNJ09&loadpage=displaysubsection.cfm

Ref 2:It’haaful Qaaree Bittaleeqaat Alaa Sharh As-Sunnah Lil Imaam Barbahaaree (rahimahullaah) pages 287-288′ vol 2′ by Shaikh Saaleh al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him). Translated by Al-Markazus Salafi

source https://salaficentre.com/2019/09/3-reminders-about-dark-beliefs-and-deeds-of-those-who-scream-and-wail-slash-whip-and-hit-themselves-on-the-day-of-aashooraa-the-raafidah-and-the-aqeedah-of-ar-rajah/

[2] Reminders About Dark Beliefs and Deeds of Those Who Scream and Wail; Slash, Whip and Hit Themselves On The Day of Aa’shooraa: [Origins of The Raafidah, Some Heretics Behind Beliefs of The Raaafidah- Past and Present; Some Similarities Between Raafidah And Other Deviants- [By Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan, Shaikh Muqbil and Shaikh Rabee]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Question to Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan [hafidhahullaah]: Is it correct that the first to innovate the Madhab of the Raafidah was Abdullaah Ibn Saba the Yahoodee?  Response: Yes, without a doubt. The Raafidah or the Shiites in general are of two types: The Shiites from the fire worshipers and the Shiites from the Yahood….they hide behind Islaam in order to corrupt it. The Yahood plotted through Abdullaah Ibn Sabah and the first affair he began with was to ignite fitnah against Uthmaan [radiyallaahu-anhu]. Listen to here: https://safeshare.tv/x/krhxTksllR

Some of the Main Heretics Behind the [Forbidden and Exaggerated] Allegiance to the [Family of Ali (radiyallaahu-anhu)] – By Shaikh Muqbil [rahimahullaah]

Al-Mu’ghee’rah Bin Sa’eed- What do the scholars say about this heretic?

Al-Haafidz Adh-Dhahabi [rahimahullaah] stated in ‘Al-Meezaan’ and Al-Haafidz Ibn Hajr [rahimahullaah] stated in ‘Lisaan Al-Meezaan’ (6/75): [He is] Al-Mughee’rah Bin Saeed Al-Bajalee Al Koofee- the Raafidi, the liar.

Ibn Adee [rahimahullaah] said: ‘There was none in Kufa more cursed than Al-Mughee’rah Bin Saeed due to the falsehood he narrated about Ali [radiyallaahu-anhu].  He was always telling lies about the family of the Prophet [sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam] and he had no chain of narration for what he narrated.’ Al A’mash [rahimahullaah] asked the heretic Al-Mugheerah Bin Saeed, ‘’Did Ali [radiyallaahu-anhu] use to give life to the dead?’’  He replied, “By the One in whose hand my soul is, had Ali wished, he could have brought Aad and Thamud back to life.’’

The End of Al-Mughee’rah the Raafidi – the Liar

AbuBakr Bin Ayyaash [rahimahullaah] said: I saw Khaalid Bin Abdillaah Al Qasree [an Umayyad governor in Iraq] when he approached Al-Mughee’rah Bin Saeed and his followers; then he [Khaalid] killed a man amongst them and said to Mughee’rah, ‘’Bring him back to life’’, because Mugheerah used to hold that he can give life to the dead.  So, Al-Mugheerah said, ‘’I swear by Allaah! I cannot give life to the dead.’’  Khaalid ordered that grass be brought to kindle a fire; then he said to Al-Mugheerah, ‘’Enter it’’, but he refused.  Then a man amongst Al-Mugheerah’s companions rushed into the [fire] and burnt completely. So khaalid said to Al-Mugheerah, ‘’Wallaahi, he is worthier of leadership than you”. Thereafter, he [khaalid] killed Al-Mugheerah and his companions.

Ishaaq Bin Muhammad An-Nakha-ee Al-Ahmar- What do the scholars and Imaams of the Sunnah say about him?

Haafidh Ad-Dha’habee [rahimahullaah] stated in ‘Al-Meezaan’ and Ibn Hajr [rahimahullaah] stated in ‘Lisaanul Meezaan’ (1/370): Ishaaq Bin Muhammad An-Nakha’ee Al-Ahmar was a liar and a deviant amongst the Ghulaat (extremists).

Al-Khateeb [rahimahullaah] said: I heard Abdul Waahid Bin Ali Al-Asadee [rahimahullaah] saying: Ishaaq bin Muhammad An-Nakha’ee was upon a filthy school of thought, and he said that Ali [radiyallaahu-anhu] is Allaah [The Mighty and Majestic].

Al-Hasan Bin Yahyaa An-Nawbakh’tee (1) [rahimahullaah] stated in his book titled ‘Ar-Radd Alal Ghulaat’ [A refutation against the extremists]: Ishaaq Bin Muhammad Al-Ahmar claimed that Ali [radiyallaahu-anhu] is Allaah [Glorified be Allaah and free is He from all imperfections] and that Ali [radiyallaahu-anhu] manifested himself in Al-Hasan, and then in Al-Husain [radiyallaahu-anhumaa]; and that Ali [radiyallaahu-anhu] was the one who sent Muhammad [sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam] as a Messenger.

These are some of the fairy tales [or superstitions] and lies of the Raafidah and [none] can protect you from these falsehoods except Allaah [Glorified be He and free is He from all imperfections]. Therefore, you should hold fast to the Book [of Allaah] and the [authentic] Sunnah of His Messenger [sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam], and Allaah guides whomsoever He pleases to the straight path.

And do not think that these fairy tales [or superstitions] have ceased and decreased, [rather] due to these fairy tales, the Raafidah of Iran are still waiting for the emergence of Muhammad Bin Al-Hasan Al-Askari. (2)

(1) Al-Hasan Bin Yahyaa An-Nawbakh-tee (rahimahullaah) should not be confused with Hasan ibn Musa An-Nawbakhtee who was a Shia writer. (2) They claim that this Hasan Al-Askari is hiding in a tunnel waiting to emerge.  We’ll see the falsity of this claim Inshaa-Allaah.

 The Saba’iyyoon hiding Themselves in Islaam

The Saba’iyyoon are the companions of Abdullaah Bin Saba, who said to Ali, “You are; you are”; meaning, “You are the deity”. Haafidh Adh-Dhahabi [rahimahullaah] said: Abdullaah bin Saba was from the extremists amongst the heretics- misguided and misguiding others.   Ibn Asaakir [rahimahullaah] said: He [Abdullaah Bin Saba] was originally from Yemen; a Yahoodi who manifested Islaam [i.e. showed that he was a Muslim], travelled around the Muslim lands to turn them away from obedience to their leaders and to bring about evil between them, and he entered into Damascus for that reason.

Abu Ya’laa [rahimahullaah] reported in his Musnad from Al-Jalaas who said, ‘’I heard Ali [radiyallaahu-anhu] saying to Abdullaah Bin Saba, ‘’Indeed, there will be thirty liars at the approach of the hour”, and you are one of them. Abdullaah bin Saba had followers and they were called the Saba’iyyoon.  They believe that Godhead is with Ali [radiyallaahu-anhu].  And indeed Ali [radiyallaahu-anhu] burnt them with fire during his Khilaafah. And do not think that the followers of Abdullaah Bin Saba have perished, [rather] there is that leader of misguidance -khumeini, who displays jealousy for Islaam, yet he destroys its pillars. And some of the ignorant ones amongst the Ikhwan al- Muslimoon were deceived by Khumeini, and they used to mention him on the pulpits; but when the Book titled: ‘Jaa’a Dawrul Majoos’ came out, they were shaken. They keep quiet and did not praise Khumeini [anymore]. Perhaps the Muslims will take a lesson from the story of Abdullaah Bin Saba and be warned against the machinations [or secret plots] and filth of the Raafidah, because their call is based on deception. [An Excerpt from Ilhaadul Khumeini Fee Ardil Haramayn. Pages 125-140.slightly paraphrased]

Contemporary Heretic of The Raafidah- Aayatush Shaytaan khumeini

http://www.shia.bs/articles/jmfhm-ayat-al-shaytan-khomeini-seeking-aid-from-the-dead-is-not-shirk.cfm

Similarities Between Raafidah, Deviated Yahood and Nasaaraa

Shaikh Rabee [hafidhahullaah] stated:

1: Yahood said that leadership is not appropriate except for a man from the family of Dawood. The raafidah say that leadership is not appropriate except for a man from the children of Ali Bin Abee Taalib [radiyallaahu anhu]. 2: Yahood said that there is no jihaad until the dajjaal appears…. The raafidah say that there is no jihaad until the mehdi appears. .. 3: The yahood delay the maghrib prayer until the stars appear, likewise the raafidah delay it. 4: The yahood distort the (verses and meaning of the) torah and the raafidah distort the (verses and meanings of the) Qur’aan. 5: The Yahood hate Jibreal (alayhis salaam ) and they say: “He is our enemy amongst the Angels.” Likewise a group amongst the raafidah say that Jibreal (alayhis salaam ) made a mistake by giving the revelation to Muhammad (sallal.laahu.alayhi wasallam ); rather he was sent to Ali. 6: The yahood used to hate the sahaabah and likewise the raafidah hate the sahaabah.

Some similarities between the raafidah and the nasaaraa

1: The nasaaraa innovated many religious holydays. Likewise, the raafidah (innovated the religious holidays) for the days when Umar and uthmaan were murdered. 2: The nasaaraa make pictures of Eesaa and Maryam (alayhimas salaam) and place them in their churches. They exalt them and prostrate to them. Likewise, the raafidah make pictures of their imaams–they exalt them; rather they make sujood to them and to their graves… [An Excerpt from ‘Man Hum Irhaabiyyoon, Ahumus Safiyyoon Aw Rawaafid: pages 20 onwards. Slightly paraphrased]

 

source https://salaficentre.com/2019/09/2-reminders-about-dark-beliefs-and-deeds-of-those-who-scream-and-wail-slash-whip-and-hit-themselves-on-the-day-of-aashooraa-origins-of-the-raafidah-some-heretics-behind-beliefs-of-the/